Understanding Git Merging: Orthogonal vs Recursive Perspectives


A Comparative Analysis of Git Merge Strategies: Ort vs. Recursive

In Git, merge strategies play a crucial role in harmonizing changes from different branches. Two significant strategies, “ort” (Ostensibly Recursive Three-way) and the traditional recursive, offer unique merging approaches, each with its strengths and applications.

  1. Performance:

Recursive Strategy:

As Git’s default merge strategy, the traditional recursive approach is generally effective for various merge scenarios. However, it may face efficiency issues in large repositories or complex merge histories.

ORT Strategy:

“Ort”, introduced to tackle performance challenges in the recursive strategy, prioritizes efficiency. It excels in large repositories or situations where performance optimization is essential.

Switching Between Strategies: Transitioning from recursive to “ort” is as simple as using the git merge -s ort command. Conversely, switching from “ort” to recursive can be done with git merge -s recursive.

2. Conflict Resolution:

Recursive Strategy:

It provides basic conflict resolution capabilities, requiring users’ manual intervention to resolve conflicts flagged by Git. ORT Strategy: “Ort” has enhanced conflict resolution mechanisms that automate conflict resolution where possible, reducing the need for manual intervention.

3. Flexibility:

Recursive Strategy: As the default, the recursive strategy has widespread support and understanding within the Git ecosystem. ORT Strategy: Designed for extensibility, “ort” facilitates custom merge strategies or integration with third-party tools, offering a more adaptable framework.

4. Default Behavior:

Recursive Strategy: Git typically defaults to the recursive strategy for most merge operations, unless another strategy is explicitly specified. ORT Strategy: Git may opt for the “ort” strategy in specific scenarios where it deems it more suitable, demonstrating its adaptability in selecting the optimal strategy for a given merge.

In summary, the choice between the “ort” and traditional recursive merge strategies depends on your specific needs. Choose the “ort” strategy for improved performance in large repositories or complex merge scenarios. However, Git’s automatic selection of the most appropriate strategy for merges alleviates the need for manual specification in most cases.


Check out more posts in my blogs